tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299462378544506867.post1811686813415808528..comments2008-07-13T21:30:16.028-07:00Moderatorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04552772617346519138noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299462378544506867.post-29508818392907130312008-07-13T21:30:00.000-07:002008-07-13T21:30:00.000-07:00it is too hard to read your yellow answersAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299462378544506867.post-58714455445014426062008-06-29T12:05:00.000-07:002008-06-29T12:05:00.000-07:00According to Public works, the tower doesn't meet earthquake standards, and is too small. The new tank will be larger to help maintain water pressure, and will have a system to shut off the pumps when it is filled. No more overflows.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299462378544506867.post-83108735775260688972008-06-19T13:04:00.000-07:002008-06-19T13:04:00.000-07:00Hey, moderator:<BR/><BR/>Great to see you got the blog up and running. I will be reading often!Towandahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18245494480579308875noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299462378544506867.post-49402720060144219602008-06-15T15:34:00.000-07:002008-06-15T15:34:00.000-07:00In part, the tower could be paid for by increasing fees for water useage agreed to in 2005. The real question is whether this is even necessary in the first placeAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com